Optimisation from transition state geometries: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: == Introduction == An IRC calculation is a relatively expensive calculation in terms of cpu time. There exists a cheaper alternative: # Make a small displacement of the TS geometry along t... |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
</pre></code> | </pre></code> | ||
== Comment | == Comment to the input example == | ||
# the shorter step length is ensured by including the option "maxstep=5" (the default is maxstep=30) in the keyword "opt" | |||
# when using such a small step length, the energy differences between two successive energy points can be very small. In order to compute this energy difference more accurately, it may be necessary to tighten the convergence criteria. In the example above scf(conver=10) is used (conver=8 is default). | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 17 January 2008
Introduction
An IRC calculation is a relatively expensive calculation in terms of cpu time. There exists a cheaper alternative:
- Make a small displacement of the TS geometry along the forward and the backward direction of the eigenmode corresponding to the imaginary frequency.
- From the two geometries created, start a geometry optimisation.
- In order not to step over small hills on the energy surface, do this optimisation with a small step length.
Input example
%mem=720MB
%chk=prodOpt_b1.chk
#p scf=(conver=10) opt=(calcfc,maxstep=5,maxcycle=70) freq=internalmodes b3lyp/genecp nosymm
optimisation from TS
0 1
76 0 -0.983269 -0.024600 0.000009
6 0 -1.635059 1.808684 -0.000683
6 0 1.002562 0.806467 -0.000303
6 0 -0.600233 -0.734234 1.770918
8 0 -2.030038 2.894422 -0.001086
8 0 1.492402 1.913347 -0.000718
8 0 -0.307490 -1.181244 2.800662
6 0 -0.600203 -0.735596 -1.770350
6 0 -2.758976 -0.827633 0.000294
8 0 -0.307441 -1.183405 -2.799741
8 0 -3.815309 -1.292251 0.000450
1 0 3.461423 1.540051 1.193881
6 0 3.832917 0.518831 1.241612
7 0 3.465095 -0.180024 0.000068
1 0 4.925251 0.506760 1.356016
1 0 3.372253 -0.002424 2.083099
6 0 3.832916 0.517887 -1.242008
6 0 3.830772 -1.601406 0.000609
8 0 1.689587 -0.353491 0.000138
1 0 4.925248 0.505724 -1.356404
1 0 3.461427 1.539150 -1.195052
1 0 3.372251 -0.004009 -2.083100
1 0 4.923748 -1.699659 0.000649
1 0 3.414653 -2.076758 -0.888911
1 0 3.414651 -2.076082 0.890495
@/home/tfjermestad/basisSet/basisSet.txt/N
Comment to the input example
- the shorter step length is ensured by including the option "maxstep=5" (the default is maxstep=30) in the keyword "opt"
- when using such a small step length, the energy differences between two successive energy points can be very small. In order to compute this energy difference more accurately, it may be necessary to tighten the convergence criteria. In the example above scf(conver=10) is used (conver=8 is default).